A letter addressed to the Supreme Court of India complained about the prevalence of bonded labour system in Cutton, Anangpur and Lakkarpur areas of Faridabad District in Haryana State. ... the various other directions given by us in this judgment have been and are being carried out by the mine lessees and stone crusher owners." This Court ...
H ig h C ourt of H .P . IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA. CWP No. 7935 of 2024 Date of Decision: 09.08.2024 _____ M/s Shiv Stone Crusher ...Petitioner Versus HP State Electricity Board Ltd. and others. ...
Judgment summaries are shortened versions of the Court's full judgment. The Court prepares judgment summaries for some cases. They are made available on our website, and are removed and archived 12 months after their date of publication. The judgment summaries are for general information proposes only. They provide an …
Get free access to the complete judgment in THE STATE OF HARYANA v. M/S KC STONE CRUSHING CO. on CaseMine.
M.M KUMAR, ACJ. 1. The instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for quashing of order dated 09.04.2012 (P-14) and subsequent order dated 09.04.2012 (P-15).. 2. In pursuance of direction issued by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 22220 of 2011 decided on 30.11.2011 (Karam Singh v.State of …
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. Petitioners are aggrieved by District Magistrate, Sonbhadra's order dated 20.05.2017 whereby referring to this Court's interim order dated 12.05.2017 passed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No. 18769 of 2017 (All India Kaimoor Peoples Front v.State of U.P), he has directed …
The order was set aside by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 6725/2008 dated 19.11.2008), and confining the definition of "mine" as defined vide explanation (b) to Section 3 of 1949 Act, observed that, the stone crushing activities carried out by those other than mine owners and at a distinct place than the mine are not …
The petitioner has approached this Court asserting that they have obtained all necessary consents, permissions and licences for the purpose of operating a stone quarry in their property, having an extent of 0.7871 Hectors, comprised of in Re-Sy. Nos. 496/2A, 496/2B, and 496/3 of the Parappa Village.
In order to operate certain stone quarries near Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary, the State of Odisha submitted a proposal to the Standing Committee of NBWL. In its 40th meeting …
The matter relates to an interim order passed by the National Green Tribunal (NGT), directing prosecution and compensation proceedings to be initiated for damaging …
Supreme Court of India State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 15 September, 2017 Equivalent citations: AIR 2017 SC (SUPP) 355, 2018 (14) SCC 537, (2017) 11 SCALE 651, 2017 (4) KLT SN 74 (SC) ... The High Court in its judgment has noticed details of few of the writ petitions facts of only leading petition …
Get free access to the complete judgment in Shree Channabasaveshwara Stone Crusher v. State Of Karnataka on CaseMine.
Full text of the Supreme Court Judgment: Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs. Union of India & Ors | Judgments dated August, 1991. ... He will also enquire from the mine lessees and owners of stone crushers as also from the thekedars and jamadars whether there are any advances made by them to the labourers working in the stone …
Closure of stone crushers leaves labour high and dry. ON MAY 15 this year, the Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgement in response to a public interest suit demanding the closure of the 300-odd stone-crushing units in and around New Delhi. Unlicensed units were immediately closed and the rest are to be shut down by August 15.
i. Hazara Stone Crusher. ii. AnsarMajeed Khan Stone Crusher. iii. Gujjar Stone Crusher. He has also stated that pursuant to the judgment of august Supreme Court of Pakistan operations of the said crushermachines were stopped. Similarly, the Environment Department of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Respondents no. 7 & 8,
Whether services provided by State Government of Rajasthan is governed by applicability of Notification No. 13/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 under entry number 5 and whether Vinayak Stone Crusher is taxable person in this case to discharge GST under reverse charge mechanism or whether given service is covered by exclusion …
Union of India (Stone Crushing Case), 1992 Supp (2) SCC 85, cases relating to Stone crushing operation in the vicinity of Delhi, wherein the total closure of the operation ordered by Union of India and crusher owner instead of approaching the Supreme Court in the pending matters, filed writ petitions in High Court and obtained interim orders ...
All the writ petitioners supported the judgment of Uttarakhand High Court dated 01.07.2004 in M/s Kumaon Stone Crusher wherein, the High Court has held that no levy of Transit Fee can be made on the finished items of stone i.e. …
Get free access to the complete judgment in Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd. . on CaseMine. ... Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd. . Supreme Court Of India Mar 14, 2000; Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI Recommendations) Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher …
O R D E R. 1 The grievance of the appellants is that the impugned order of the National Green Tribunal 1 dated 12 April 2022 issuing an ad interim direction that the stone crushers shall not be permitted to operate in the absence of requisite pollution prevention and control systems was passed without hearing the appellants.. 2 The appellants would …
3. The matter pertains to two stone crushers operated by the respondent nos. 4 and 5 in Village Fatta Bangar at Haldwani in Nainital District. The contention of the appellant (based on the report dated 7th April, 2014 of the Halka Patwari) is that the two stone crusher units are operating in violation of the statutory environmental
1 The grievance of the appellants is that the impugned order of the National Green Tribunal 1 dated 12 April 2022 issuing an ad interim direction that the stone crushers shall not …
That is why this Court granted an interim order earlier and directed that no mining and stone-crushing operations shall be carried on within a distance of 1 km from the lake or …
Get free access to the complete judgment in THE STATE OF HARYANA v. M/S KC STONE CRUSHING CO. on CaseMine.
Supreme Court of India M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India & Ors on 18 March, 2004 Author: ... Stone crushing sites in Pali : EPCA has inspected the stone crushing sites in the area. ... This is despite conditions in the judgment dated 10th May, 1996 by this Court that the Director Mining and Ecology Haryana would be responsible for mining in …
Get free access to the complete judgment in Maa Vindhya Stone Crusher Company v. State of U.P. and Another on CaseMine. ... This is also the view of the Supreme Court in the judgement reported in 1970 (1) SCC 121: The Board of High School and intermediate Education, U.P. and others vs. Kumari Chitra Srivastava and others. …
Full text of the Supreme Court Judgment: M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India & Ors | Judgments dated May, 1992. Follow @SCJudgments. ... The writ petitions filed by the owners/proprietors of stone crushers in Delhi High Court which have been transferred to this Court shall stand dismissed with no order as to costs. (4) The Stone crushers in …
The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and found the transit fee under Rule 5 to be regulatory, stating that it was not necessary for the State to establish quid pro quo. The …
EPCA was informed that after the Hon'ble Supreme Court directive of May 2002, the stone crushers were not being operated, except between the hours of 5 am …
In an appeal by Ministry of Environment, the Supreme Court has called for a report from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) on the issue of pollution by Stone Crushing Units and as to ...